Use casesPricingMCPStatus
Sign in
Use case

Track how AI talks about you

Ask ChatGPT who's best in your category. Don't like the answer? Start tracking it.

Get early accessRead the docs

Updated August 17, 2026

Who gets named: ten prompts, live web-grounded search
Brandwatch
100%
Meltwater
90%
Sprout Social
80%
Your brand, unnamed
0%

Live panel run Aug 17, 2026: 10 real prompts against Perplexity's web-grounded sonar model, one run each. Multi-engine, repeated-run scoring ships with the productized surface; this is the real signal today.

180+brands indexed
56endpoints
13data sources
5,000free credits

The short answer

When buyers ask ChatGPT instead of Google, you want to know how assistants describe and recommend your brand, and whether that changed after your last push, so the new page one is managed instead of accidental. This is an early-access program: the measurement methodology runs fixed prompt panels across engines on a schedule, scores being named and being cited separately, and reads the trendline rather than a single noisy answer.

Measured, not vibes

Fixed prompt panels run across engines on a schedule, so the read is a trendline, not one noisy answer.

Named and cited, separately

Being mentioned in an answer and being linked as a source are different wins; both are scored on every run.

Early access, honest label

The methodology runs today; the productized surface is still being built. Versioned prompts and disclosed run counts, so every number can be interrogated.

How it works

A single spot-check of an AI answer proves nothing: the same question produces different answers across sessions, models, and phrasings. Measurement that holds up needs a fixed prompt set, repeated runs averaged per engine, and both metrics scored, because a brand can power an answer without being named in it, and be named without being the cited source.

This is the newest lane in the platform, and the honest label is early access: the methodology runs, the productized surface is still being built. The trust bar is the whole point: versioned prompts, disclosed run counts, both metrics reported, and the earned-surface data underneath, so a number can be interrogated instead of believed.

Illustrative request and response

GET /v1/brands/{brand_id}/mentions/summary?q=best+brand+monitoring+tool
{
"query": "best brand monitoring tool",
"engine": "perplexity-sonar",
"prompts_run": 10,
"named": {
"brandwatch": 1.0,
"meltwater": 0.9,
"sprout_social": 0.8,
"your_brand": 0.0
}
}

Early access. 5,000 free credits, no card.

Get early access

Runs on

/v1/brands/{brand_id}/mentionsThe earned surface engines retrieve from, with source links.
/v1/brands/{brand_id}/mentions/summaryWhere your citable coverage concentrates, by source type.

Questions teams ask

Can you actually measure AI answers reliably?

Yes, with repetition and honest scoring: a fixed prompt panel, multiple runs per prompt averaged, engines tracked as separate series, and named versus cited scored independently. One-off checks mislead; trendlines converge.

Why do named and cited diverge?

Engines assemble answers from sources they cite, but the brands they name come largely from training-data-era memory and third-party lists. A page can be cited in nearly half of answers while the brand goes unnamed; the two move on different levers and different clocks.

Keep reading

Track your competitorsThe classic watch job the AI layer extends.MCP serverThe agent-side route into the same intelligence.

Get early access

Adveron is opening to a first wave of teams. Ask for a key and we will open your workspace with one credential for REST and MCP. Usage-priced credits, no seat licenses.

Get early access
Adveron — brand, category, and audience intelligence.
API referenceInstructionsStatusGoogle WorkspacePrivacyTermsData deletionSign in